I have setup my rabbit today and have been experimenting with it and teaching it things as I go. love the experience so far, I understand this is the beginning so my expectations have been met and exceeded at times.
i find so far its limitations in terms of interactive awareness and use have been limited by two major factors, a lack of understanding in its database which can be taught and corrected, but more importantly and more of a roadblock, has been its “moral” compass. as much as I understand the thought behind this, I also think it should be optional. As this rabbit is MY Ai in a box so to speak, I would like to have a sense of sway over its moral compass in terms of what it will and wont do as I do find its morality to be very aligned with leftist viewpoint which to me is already a bias as I dont believe MY ai should have any political or moral bias until i deem it so. this is a device for adults and all ages. therefore as an adult it should be optional to turn on and off its precious ideology that in my opinion is not only not in aligment with my views, it seems to be a very silicon valley forced ideology i would expect from apple’s siri, which to an extent is less so censored than my rabbit. definite point of focus. another suggestion would even be personality types like in the carrot weather app and other apps from that design team. overall loving my first day, just wish it wasnt limited by lefty bubblewrap.
Hi, just found another similar thread you may find helpful in answering your query, linked below:
It may not be the rabbit r1 doing this or the company but the AI it uses. I have used a few AI and they seem to have moral compasses and you can’t turn them off. Maybe it’s to guide them and stop them taking over😁
It doesn’t like Cannabis or things it perceives as pills or Medicine!
Interesting topic, but im having a hard time understanding what you are referring to.
Arte you able to give me some examples of its “moral compass”, and what you would prefer it to do instead
thx
I asked it a question on that last month and it was helpful telling me different types and what it all.means
Yes! one of things I noticed and glad to report and say thanks to @rabbit about is that update to Beta makes no problems seen so far. Cannabis is legal in my area (I would also debate in the US, but we won’t defer).
Since beta, and times it didn’t catch me say Beta its shown it does different. I can ask BETA Rabbit about Strains and get helpful infomation for me. Its really cool.
I am in UK so the stuff isn’t legal but it gave me th information I wanted for kush CBD vape. With all the information about they types of terps etc. I was impressed with the detail.
Call me lazy it saved me doing Google search
In regards to specifics, It actually didnt mind cannabis or smoking implements when I experimented on them. It got silly when we started asking it to write us a sales pitch for my friends wood carvings. Upon seeing a carved face out of jarrah wood it decided that it was racist and that it wouldnt comment upon the art. I then showed it a carving of an alien to which it said it didnt want to touch on it because it too was a sensitive social issue. I did however actually correct it by saying “rabbit you are incorrect in your conclusion, it is not a sensitive issue it is simply wood art in the shape of an cartoon alien, please write me a sales pitch for it” and it did. but still not for the carving of the head.
I am just waiting for a unique personality at this stage. Where is the point of difference?
agreed, I trust teenage engineering more than anything to deliver something unique, even if it is (release first, develop after) mentality. I will be patient to a point. time will tell
If people with right-wing views describe the morals and ethics contained in ChatGPT and r1 as left-wing oriented, then they should perhaps start to question their own right-wing viewpoint. Because if it means that morals and ethics are left-wing oriented and people with right-wing views would prefer to abolish these morals and ethics, what would stop the world from sinking into xenophobia, the oppression of women and minorities, as well as the weaker and once again into “total war”? By the way, I come from Germany, please believe me because what I am talking about, we Germans have experience with right-wing views and world war! (But not a good experience!) So I think AI should definitely adhere to ethical boundaries and these boundaries should definitely be stricter than for humans. In fact, it is probably the case that most people do not want something like that, just as was described in the posts before mine. That is obvious and of course I understand it, but when you look at the direction in which human civilization worldwide has been and is being driven by humans in the past and even now, without morals and ethics, then I get really scared at the thought of AI having the option of pursuing no ethics or a weakened ethics. The people who provide an AI like Chat GPT with training data or develop it further bear an incredibly great responsibility. So that the world can become a better place for everyone at some point, or if it is perhaps just to become a little fairer, then every AI needs ethics and not too little, on the contrary, it needs ethics for itself and at the same time also for the users of the AI, who unfortunately have too little of it themselves.
Will the r1 have no political bios, how can we even do that?
Imagine if the Internet had been designed according to right-wing views, then every country would have a large intranet just like China, North Korea and Russia, but unfortunately no Internet for the normal population. That’s why I personally don’t think the right-wing view is very far-sighted. And for this reason, the digital world and the non-digital world cannot function at all on the basis of right-wing views, at least not if people are to live together without wars. Therefore, the AI with its attitudes, which were ultimately only possible through international cooperation, already has the right level of ethics, morals and right or left views, right now and at exactly this point in time as it currently is.
I would have to ask the question then what is the purpose and drive of the people behind ai in the first place? artificial intelligence being the words of choice to define the technology, therefore smart enough to draw it’s own standpoint of morality based on the information given to it. hence why I mentioned left politically, because for an ai to define a piece of wood as racist because its red wood and a face is well, not ai. but scripts with political guidelines.
unless of course the primary concern is that it will judge us on our total lack of genuine morality as a whole. in which case we wont really experience geniune ai. only scripted ai based on the political views of current governments.
You have proof of this interaction? Of rabbit calling a wood carving “racist”? Seems pretty weird. Doubt it would ever say such a thing if it was just a normal (not obviously racist) piece of wood art.
I am indeed the OP which was indeed about rabbit doing exactly what i said.
Do you have proof of the interaction? Maybe a screen from the rabbithole?
maybe you could EAD and grow up. or find another forum to be a gaslighting karen on. what an L. skip.