I’d like to see a feature where we can ask for information, then ask a follow up question for an email with a list of sources the rabbit pulled that information from. Its always good to have options to double check information, especially on accuracy sensitive topics.
I hate I ask for sources and it refuses to tell me…
I was curious and not to make it political, but I probed questions till I got this answer and then refused to tell me who its sources for calculating this is.
Great test! I understand the need for compliance, but I feel like if we ask for sources it shouldn’t run into compliancy issues unless we were being pointed at harmful links.
We almost need a way like other AI to report when these questions have problems. I am also big on the 5th Estate and reporting to the people as validating sources so refusing sources to me is a red flag and a big NO, NO - on my first experience is I probed deeply then informed Rabbit I found it a big problem to be Closed like this and sources need to be Open information.
I could be wrong on the above one and not politically sided (well, south, but I digress) and its not to be, seriously on intelligence… Sure Clinton is a Rogue Scholar and maybe brilliant, but he’s the estimated smartest? GHW Bush (Sr) was a brilliant financer and CIA leader but he’s just a bit smarter than Jr? Sounds like inaccurate calculations. I hoped maybe more insight into how these came together.
Wish it would have enlightened me more. I’d definitely take email of sources.