# Operator - ChatGPT **URL:** \ **Category:** the world of ai\ **Created:** [January 24, 2025, 1:06am UTC](https://forum.rabbitcommunity.tech/t/operator-chatgpt/14688 "2025-01-24T01:06:27Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 5
**Author:** ![nzwaneveld](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/forum.rabbitcommunity.tech/nzwaneveld/32/4300_2.png) [@nzwaneveld](https://forum.rabbitcommunity.tech/u/nzwaneveld)\ **Post date:** [January 29, 2025, 9:09am UTC](https://forum.rabbitcommunity.tech/t/operator-chatgpt/14688/5 "2025-01-29T09:09:59Z")
Jesse published a video on January 28th, 2025 with a side by side comparison between LAM playground and OpenAI Operator: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jjb4lLsoMcE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jjb4lLsoMcE) Here is a TL;DR (or in this case TL;DW - Too Long; Didn’t Watch) summary of the comparisons described in Jesse’s video… Rabbit LAM Playground and OpenAI Operator are both generic web agent systems that perform tasks on destination websites, but they have differences in their functionality. The main takeaways: - **User Interface (UI):** OpenAI’s Operator has a more refined UI with sample queries and prompts, which is especially useful for first-time users. Rabbit LAM Playground doesn’t have a fancy UI but can be used directly on the R1 by pressing a button to talk to it. - **Task Execution:** - **Speed:** Rabbit LAM Playground was generally faster in completing tasks compared to Open AI’s Operator. - **Cookie Management:** Rabbit’s cookie management is more user-friendly than Open AI’s Operator. - **Other:** Both systems encounter common issues in the agent era, such as login and CAPTCHA. Both systems are also continuously evolving. - **Cost:** Access to OpenAI’s Operator is part of the pro plans, which cost $200 a month. Rabbit LAM Playground is included in the one-off cost of $199. Rabbit LAM Playground outperformed OpenAI Operator in several aspects: - **Speed:** Rabbit LAM Playground was generally **faster** at completing tasks than OpenAI Operator. - **Task Execution:** In testing, Rabbit LAM Playground was **faster** and more efficient in the following: - **Restaurant reservations** : It did not require manual location input, using the R1’s location instead, whereas OpenAI’s Operator struggled with this task… - **Ordering ingredients** : It was faster in getting to the task of ordering from Instacart, while OpenAI’s Operator required more manual input. - **Multiple destinations** : Rabbit LAM Playground successfully completed a task requiring multiple destinations (Reddit and Best Buy), whereas OpenAI Operator was blocked by network security. - **Cookie Management:** Rabbit’s **cookie management is more user-friendly** compared to Open AI Operator. In summary, while OpenAI Operator has a more refined user interface, Rabbit LAM Playground appears to be faster and more efficient in task completion, with better cookie management, and does not appear to have issues with anti-bot detection. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.rabbitcommunity.tech/t/operator-chatgpt/14688)._