# Followup questions and news

**URL:** <https://forum.rabbitcommunity.tech/t/followup-questions-and-news/11484>\
**Category:** general chat\
**Created:** [July 10, 2024, 3:55pm UTC](https://forum.rabbitcommunity.tech/t/followup-questions-and-news/11484 "2024-07-10T15:55:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LadyTink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/e47c2d/32.png) [@LadyTink](https://forum.rabbitcommunity.tech/u/LadyTink)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2024, 3:55pm UTC](https://forum.rabbitcommunity.tech/t/followup-questions-and-news/11484/1 "2024-07-10T15:55:59Z")

</div>

So I like to ask the r1 for daily news, both as a test and a practical thing.

The issue is, when I go to ask it for followup questions, it gets very confused, and sometimes makes up stuff.

Like today, I asked the the r1

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/uploads/rabbit/original/2X/0/0f049a0262693aa4d847459c8131f0543d68c55d.png)

and I heard the story about “clean energy methods”, so I wanted to learn more about that story.

so I asked it for details on that story, and it just gave me some generic stuff about solar and wind.

Like if you say “new clean energy methods” I expect either a new method, or something a bit more than just the methods we already have.

I’m not trying to rant here, just a little frustrated with the way it handles news followups